Job search
Job Search
Latest news
More news: (showing 1 - 20 of 13969)           
UK only International

Gyms file lawsuit over indefinite closure

By Tom Walker    19 May 2020
The gym owners claim the decision to allow some businesses to reopen but keep gyms closed is a violation of their 'right to exist' / Shutterstock/Kawin168
Ohio gyms are capable of operating safely, and have the right to operate on equal terms with other Ohio businesses
– Maurice Thompson

Independent gym owners in Ohio have filed a lawsuit against state officials, challenging the decision to keep fitness facilities closed.

A group of 35 gym owners are claiming that the decision by the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) to allow the reopening of some businesses – but keeping gyms closed – is a violation of their "right to exist".

On April 30 the ODH issued an order which enables the reopening (or provides a pathway to reopening) of many of the state's industries, including retail and restaurants – but leaves gyms closed indefinitely.

According to the gym operators, the order was done "without regard to whether gyms are capable of operating safely".

A statement issued by the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law – which is representing the gym operators – states: "(Our complaint) asserts that the Health Director’s unfettered discretion over matters of quarantine and isolation is impermissibly vague and violate the separation of powers on its face.

"Further, the use of those powers to criminalise gyms, that could otherwise comply with each of the safety regulations articulated in the April 30, 2020 Order, violates operators’ right to equal protection.

Maurice Thompson, executive director of the 1851 Center, added: "The Ohio Constitution requires greater scrutiny of vague and discriminatory enactments that trample Ohioans’ property rights.

"Ohio gyms are capable of operating safely and have the right to operate on equal terms with other Ohio businesses. Once gyms have opened, we are committed to ensuring that these arbitrary policies never recur."

The case isn't the first lawsuit brought against local authorities by gym companies and operators in the US in recent weeks.

In the state of Virginia, a judge rejected a petition from Merrill Hall – who owns a chain of Gold's Gym franchises and other gyms – who was seeking to reopen his facilities despite an executive order requiring gyms to remain closed.

Dismissing the case, Circuit Court judge Claude Worrell said Virginia law gives the governor broad authority to issue executive orders during a public health emergency.

independent gym  Ohio  fitness  gym  1851 Center  lawsuit 
Sign up for FREE ezines
Related news

Company profile

Company profile: Serco Leisure
Serco Leisure Operating Limited is one of the UK’s leading national operators of leisure centres, destination venues and elite sporting facilities.
View full profile >
More company profiles

Featured Supplier

Supporting long-term health: why whole body vibration belongs in clinical settings
As healthcare continues to shift towards prevention, there’s a growing focus on helping people stay active, independent and feeling good for longer.
View full details >
More featured suppliers

Property & Tenders

Location: Stratford, East London.
Company: Lee Valley Regional Park Authority
Location: Y Felinheli, LL56 4QN
Company: Newmark
Location: Newhaven, Sussex
Company: EiA Real Estate
Location: Tutbury Castle, Staffordshire
Company: Savills
Location: Oxford
Company: University of Oxford
More properties & tenders

Diary dates

21-24 Sep 2026
The Langham Huntington Pasadena , Pasadena, United States
06-08 Oct 2026
Messe Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
22-22 Oct 2026
QEII Conference Centre, London
26-29 Oct 2027
Koelnmesse Exhibition Centre, Cologne, Germany
More diary dates